![]() ![]() ![]() Sometimes the restriction is imposed by the artwork itself, because of the size, location, condition, etc. However, as is known, it’s not always possible to use the ideal procedure with all equipment and analysis desired. In other words it is necessary to create a strategy and approach procedure. It’s necessary to think also about whether the analysis will be done in situ or if the work must be carried. Then it’s necessary to know that methods of analysis can give the expected response, which of these methods are available and which are possible to be applied to works of art. First of all the question and the reason of this question must be clear. The non-destructive analysis methods are preferred to the destructive. The scientific research on works of art must be done very carefully. ‘Ideal’ Versus ‘Possible’ in Field of Scientific Investigation Nowadays Marcia Rizzo, Professor of Superior Conservation Course / conservator, PUC- SP Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, Brazil The aim of this paper is to discuss the relationship between the “ideal” and the “possible” in the field of scientific research applied to conservation of cultural heritage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |